EXISTENTIALISM
Existentialism
is a twentieth century philosophical movement which place emphasis on
individual existence, freedom and choice.
It is based on the principle that concrete, individual existence takes
precedence over abstract, conceptual essence and holds that human being are
totally free and responsible for their acts and that this responsibility is the
source of their feelings of dread and anguish.
Soren Kierkegaard, a Danish philosopher is considered to be the Founder
of existentialism. The term
existentialism, however is coined by the French Philosopher Gabriel arcel in
1943. Existentialism was as much a literary phenomenon as a philosophical
one. Chief exponents of existentialism
are Soven Kierkegard, Friedrich Nietzsche, Karl Jaspers, Gabriel Marcel, Sarte,
Dostoyevsky, Tolstoy.
BASIC
TENTS OF EXISTENTIALISM
Existentialism is a philosophy
concerned with finding self and the meaning of life through free will, choice
and personal responsibility. The
following are the basic tents of existentialism.
1. The
essence of man lies in existence.
Existence is the source from which thinking and acting springs.
2. Existence
precedes essence. Individuals create the
meaning and essence of their lives, and that this essence follows from their
existence. In other words, you need
existence to have essence.
3. The
centre of existence is man, not the truth.
The physical world has no inherent meaning outside & human
existence.
4. Knowledge
is intuitive. Mind is the source and
substance of all knowledge.
5. There
are no absolute or fixed values. The
source of value is always internal. The
individual creates the value which is to be found in his existence.
6. The
only authority which any person has is himself; he is answerable only to
himself as well.
7. There
exists no universal form of human nature; each of us has the free will to
develop as we see fit.
8. Subjectivity
is truth. Existentialism rejects the
existence of any source of objective, authoritative truth.
9. The
nature of reality is subjective, and lies within the individual. The ultimate and final reality resides within
the individual.
10. Man
is defined by his actions. Man is
nothing but what be makes of himself. He
is free, capable of shaping his own life and choosing his own destiny.
IMPACTS OF EXISTENTIALISM ON EDUCATION
The
major thrust of existentialism is on individual existence, freedom and
choice. It believes in the personal
interpretation of the world. It is based
on the view that the individual defines reality, truth and goodness. As such the existentialist system of
education should provide freedom and variety that permits the learner to chose what
he wants, creating one’s own reality and grows to a Free Man. It influences on contemporary educational
theory and practices.
EXISTENTIALISM AND AIM OF EDUATION
Education,
according to existentialists, should help the individual to become an authentic
man (one who has permeation of his values and choices by clear awareness of
death). It should suggest ways and means to preserve the freedom of man, even
if that freedom leads him to anguish and despair. The following are the other
aims of existentialist education.
a) The
fundamental aim of existentialist education is to impart knowledge of
self-existence.
b) Realization
of inner truth (a sense of self-identity) and subjective consciousness.
c) Existentialist
education emphasizes the development of all aspects of the learner’s inner self
(his feeling, emotion, thinking etc.) realizing ultimately what he is, what his
purpose of living is, and what he has to become,
d) Since
existentialism stress on subjective knowledge, teaching of literature and arts
is emphasized by existentialists.
e) To
develop on awareness among the students about freedom in life.
The
ultimate aim of education is to make man conscious of his destination, to give
understanding of his `being’ and ultimately leas him to his heavenly
abode. So it is clear that the
existentialism accepts the principles of liberal education.
CURRICULUM OF EXISTENTIALISM
1. Since
the existentialists believe in the individuals freedom, they do not advocate
any rigid curriculum.
2. They
recognize the `individual differences’ and wish to have diverse curricula
suiting the needs, abilities and aptitudes of the individual.
3. Curriculum,
they say should not primarily satisfy the immediate needs but also ultimate
needs.
4. The
central place is given to `humanities’, poetry, drama, music, art, novels etc.
as they exert the human impact in revealing man’s inherent guilt, sin,
suffering, tragedy, death, fate and love.
Humanities have spiritual power.
Art and Literature, they say should be taught, as they represent a
priori (cause effect) power of human nature.
Through these the students profit from the ideas and judgement of
others.
5. Second
place is given to social sciences as they lead the man to feel that he is
nothing more than an object. They however, wish to teach Social Sciences for
inculcating moral obligation and for knowing the relationship of the individual
to a group.
6. History
should be taught in order to help the students to change the course of history
and to mould future.
7. The
specialization in any field must be complemented by liberalising studies for it
is the man who counts and not the profession.
8. The
study of the world’s religion should be made so as to develop religious
attitude freely within the students.
Religion keeps him aware of death.
9. Realisation
of self-form part of the curriculum.
Self-examination and social obedience are the first lesson. The child must be saved from his own unexamined
self and from those who interfere with the free exercise of his moral decision.
10. Scientific
subjects and mathematics should be included in the curriculum but they should
not be given more stress, as they deal with objective knowledge. Self-knowledge precedes universal knowledge.
In short, they don’t believe in
formal curriculum consisting of set of body of studies to be pursued but a
curriculum, which features the reverberatory effect upon heart, and mind of
passionate good reading and then personal contact. The curriculum should be chosen, sorted out
and owned by the learner.
METHOD OF TEACHING
1. Existentialists
favour the Socratic Approach of teaching, as Socratic Method is personal,
intimate and an I-thou affair.
2. Socratic
`Problem Method’ should be accepted if the problem originates in the life of
the one who has to work out the solutions.
But it is unacceptable if the problem is derived fro the needs of the
society.
3. Like
Socrates `Personal reading’ should be stressed.
4. They
reject the group method, because in-group dynamic, the superiority of the group
decision over individual decision is prominent.
There is a danger of losing unique individualism and free choice.
5. Method
of teaching must develop the creative abilities in children. The world and man reveal themselves by their
undertakings.
THE TEACHER AND EXISTENTIALISM
1. Existentialists
do not wish the teacher to be social minded umpire or provider of free social
activity (as the pragmatists want) or a model personality (as the idealist say)
to be limited, by the students. He must
himself be a free personality engaged in such relations and projects with
individual students that they get the idea that they are too are free
personalities.
2. He
may indirectly influence them about his values but he should impose his
cherished values on them, his values become the code of conduct for the
students, who may begin to accept them without thought. Instead of expecting them to imitate he
should help them to be `original’ and `authentic’.
3. The
role of teacher is vey important because he is the creator of such as
educational situation in which the students can establish contact with his self
by becoming conscious of his self and can achieve self-realization.
4. The
teacher must build positive relationships between himself and his students.
5. The
teacher should avoid applying labels to children (such as lazy, slow learner
etc.). For individuals may indeed come
to think of themselves they this way.
6. The
teacher is also changing and growing as he guides the pupil in his discovery of
self.
THE CHILD AND THE EXISTENTIALISM
1. The
existentialists want to give full freedom to the child. But the child should know the nature of his
`self’ and recognize his being and convert imperfection into perfection.
2. They
do not want the child to become selfish, autocratic and irresponsible. Freedom is needed only for natural
development.
3. Education
should be provided according to the child’s powers and the needs. The relation of the child with his self
should be strengthened rather than served.
4. The
child has to make choices and decisions.
5. Child
needs positive evaluation, not labels.
6. Primary
emphasis must always be on the child as learner and not on the learning
programme.
7. Child
thrives better when relieved from intense competition, harsh discipline and
fear of failure. Thus each child can grow to understand his own needs and
values and take charge of the experiences for changing him. In this way self-evaluation is the beginning
and end of the learning process, as learning proceeds, child is freely growing,
fearless, understanding individual.
LIMITATIONS OF EXISTENTIALISM
1. Existentialism
emphasizes the learning of subjective knowledge. Acquisition of subjective knowledge is
largely invalid in the present age of science and technology.
2. Existential
method of teaching may be useful in moral and religious education but it will
not work in the teaching of science and technology.
3. Existential
aim of education is one-sided and thus neglects the development of complete man.
4. It
over emphasizes the learning of humanities art and literature neglects science
and productive subjects.
5. Existentialism
forgot the livelihood (utilitarian) aim of education while over emphasizing the
development of inner-self.
6. Existentialist
method focus on the individual. This
will impede socialization function of education.
7. Carried
to extremes, existentialism is a companion of anarchy.
The existential view of development
is not without its critics, many of whom view of theory and its practices as
representing a neurotic, narcissistic philosophy of pain and anguish. Existentialism is an attitude and out look
that emphasises human existence, the qualities of individual persons rather
than man in abstract of nature and the world in general. Education therefore, must edify and enrich man’s
mind so that it may be respectable in his own eyes and in the eyes of
others. It should help him to make him
human.
SATHYABHAMA
NATURAL SCIENCE
-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-